ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8433/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/01/2016 in RFA No. 100/2011 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack) BHAGABATI SAHOO Petitioner(s) VERSUS KALPANA MISHRA Respondent(s) Date : 13/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Luv Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. L.Nidhiram Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanjeeb Panigrahi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv. Ms. Charu Mathur, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain the special leave petition, which is, accordingly dismissed. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
¨ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8433/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/01/2016in RFA No. 100/2011 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack)BHAGABATI SAHOO Petitioner(s) VERSUSKALPANA MISHRA Respondent(s)Date : 13/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Luv Kumar, Adv.Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. L.Nidhiram Sharma, Adv.Mr. Sanjeeb Panigrahi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv. Ms. Charu Mathur, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RWe find no reason to entertain the special leavepetition, which is, accordingly dismissed. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER