P.C. JOSHI v. UNION OF INDIA

ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.10 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1021/2017 P.C. JOSHI Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1038/2017 (III) Date : 14-11-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Ms. Neha Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AOR Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv. Ms. Shefali Sethi, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the appellant points out that in the Writ Petition filed before the High Court, no assessment was challenged but the vires of the Act imposing the levy was challenged. Therefore, there is no need to file any affidavit of valuation. List the matter before the Court. (DEEPAK SINGH) (H.S. PARASHER) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. MANOJ JAIN Civil Appeal No(s). 1021/2017 P.C. JOSHI Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH T.C.(C) No. 7/2017 (XVI-A) C.A. No. 1038/2017 (III) Date : 23-08-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AOR Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.Pabitra Kumar Biswal,Adv. Mr.Satya Siddiqui,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal No(s). 1021/2017 & C.A. No. 1038/2017 The matter is already ordered to be listed before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers as is evident from the previous order dated 09.08.2018 of this Court. Registry is directed to process the matter for being listed before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers for orders. ……..2

ITEM NO.23 -2- T.C.(C) No. 7/2017 No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of all the respondents despite grant of last opportunity. Hence, list the matter before the Hon’ble Court as per rules. MANOJ JAIN Registrar sb

ITEM NO.51 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. MANOJ JAIN Civil Appeal No(s). 1021/2017 P.C. JOSHI Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH T.C.(C) No. 7/2017 (XVI-A) C.A. No. 1038/2017 (III) Date : 09-08-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AOR Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Ms. Fauzia Shakil,Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh,Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan,Adv. Ms. Neha Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. S.A. Siddiqui,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. Nos. 1021 and 1038/2017 Ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed affidavit of valuation along with required court fee despite grant of last chance. Viewed in that context, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await

ITEM NO.51 2 orders.  List thereafter. T.C.(C) No. 7/2017 Four weeks time, as last chance, is given to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to file the counter affidavit.    List again on 27.9.2018.                        MANOJ JAIN Registrar MG

ITEM NO.40           REGISTRAR COURT. 2              SECTION III                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS                      BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Civil Appeal  No(s).  1021/2017 P.C. JOSHI                                         Appellant(s)                                 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              Respondent(s) WITH T.C.(C) No. 7/2017 (XVI­A)  C.A. No. 1038/2017 (III)   Date : 17­05­2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s)                     Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AOR                     Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR                     Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR                     Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv.                      For Respondent(s)   Mr.Sarfraz Ahmed,Adv.                     Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                              O R D E R Civil Appeal  No(s).  1021/2017 &  1038/2017 Ld.counsel for the appellant shall file the affidavit of valuation  and the deficit court fee within four weeks as last chance. ………….2

ITEM NO.40                     ­2­ T.C.(C) No. 7/2017 Issue reminder to the concerned High Court for certificate of service in respect of respondent No.1. List the matter again on 09.08.2018.                                                 SANJAY PARIHAR                                                      Registrar SB

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) No. 414 OF 2016 GANTAVYA CHANDRA Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s) O R D E R Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through this transfer petition filed under Article 139A(1) of the Constitution of India read with Order XL, Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it fit and proper to transfer Writ Petition No. 9302(M/B)of 2012 titled as " Gantavya Chandra Vs. Union of India and others” from the High Court of judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) to this Court. We order accordingly. The Registry is directed to immediately transmit a copy of this order to the High Court of judicature at Allahabad for sending the case papers to this Court. .......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J. [ A. M. KHANWILKAR ] New Delhi; January 23, 2017.

2 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014 in WP No. 1927/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 23450/2015 (with Interim Relief) T.P.(C) No. 414/2016 (with Office Report) Date : 23/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Parikh, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Adv. Mr. Taena A. Rahman, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Adv. Dr. M. V. K. Moorthy, Adv. Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, Adv. For Intervention Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. S. Ray, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav G., Adv. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Adv. Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Soumo Palit, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG Mr. Y. Adhyaru, Sr. Adv. Mr. T. M. Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.

3 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) No. 10855 of 2015 and SLP(C) No. 23450 of 2015 Leave granted. Hearing expedited. T.P.(C) No. 414 of 2016 The Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of the signed order. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Post both the appeals and the Transferred Case together. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master (Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar (Signed order is placed on the file)

SECTION­IIIB          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 10855 AND 23450 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF P.C. Joshi, Etc. ...Petitioners ­Versus­ Union of India  & Ors.                        .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT  The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30 th  June, 2016, along with connected T.P. (C) No. 414 of 2016, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Mr. Maninder Singh, learned ASG submits that counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1 has already been filed which he has instructions to adopt on behalf of respondents No. 2 to 5 also.  Respondents No. 6 to 7 appear to be proforma respondents.  Notice to the said respondents are, therefore, dispensed with.  Learned counsel for the petitioner, if so advised, file their rejoinder affidavits within four weeks. Post these petitions on 30.08.2016 along with Transfer Petitiion No...... (Number to be given by the learned counsel) I.A. No. 4 in SLP (C) No. 23450 of 2015 I.A. No. 4 is allowed.  The applicant is permitted to intervene in the matter. ” S.L.P. (C) NO. 10855 OF 2015 It is submitted that counsel for the respondent Nos. 1­5/Union of India has not filed counter affidavit so far.  No one has filed Vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 6­8 though served with the notice. It is further submitted that Ms. T. Anamika, Advocate for the petitioner has been designated as Additional District and Session Judge. Notice for alternative arrangement has been issued to the petitioner on 27 th  August, 2016 for his fresh representation before this Hon'ble Court.  Mr. Hitendranath Rath, Advocate has on 30 th  August, 2016 filed vakalatnama/appearance  on behalf of Petitioner. S.L.P. (C) NO. 23450 OF 2015 It is submitted that counsel for respondent Nos. 1­4/Union of India has already filed Counter Affidavit on 2 nd  March, 2016 and copy of the counter affidavit has been included in the paper books. No rejoinder affidavit has been filed so far.  No one has

filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos. 5­7, though served with notice. It is lastly submitted that  t he matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29 th  November, 2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:   “ Post after x­mas holidays. ” The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.   Dated this the  21 st   day of January, 2017.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  1. Ms. T. Anamika, Advocate,     Chamber No. 63, GL.Sanghi Block.    2.  Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate,     Central Agency Section.      3. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate 48, Lawyer's Chamber. 4. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Advocate Chamber No. 133, Delhi High Court. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR nk

\2161IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONTRANSFER PETITION (C) No. 414 OF 2016GANTAVYA CHANDRA Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s)O R D E R Having heard the learned counsel for the parties andgone through this transfer petition filed under Article139A(1) of the Constitution of India read with Order XL,Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and consideringthe facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it fitand proper to transfer Writ Petition No. 9302(M/B)of 2012titled as " Gantavya Chandra Vs. Union of India andothers⬠\235 from the High Court of judicature at Allahabad(Lucknow Bench) to this Court. We order accordingly. The Registry is directed to immediately transmit acopy of this order to the High Court of judicature atAllahabad for sending the case papers to this Court. .......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J. [ A. M. KHANWILKAR ] New Delhi;January 23, 2017.2ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014in WP No. 1927/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 23450/2015(with Interim Relief)T.P.(C) No. 414/2016(with Office Report)Date : 23/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. K. K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Parikh, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Adv. Mr. Taena A. Rahman, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Adv. Dr. M. V. K. Moorthy, Adv. Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, Adv. For Intervention Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. S. Ray, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav G., Adv. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Adv. Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Soumo Palit, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG Mr. Y. Adhyaru, Sr. Adv. Mr. T. M. Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.

3 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) No. 10855 of 2015 and SLP(C) No. 23450 of 2015Leave granted. Hearing expedited. T.P.(C) No. 414 of 2016The Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of the signedorder. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposedof.Post both the appeals and the Transferred Case together. (Jayant Kumar Arora)Court Master (Renu Diwan)Assistant Registrar(Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014 in WP No. 1927/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 23450/2015 (with Interim Relief) T.P.(C) No. 414/2016 (with Office Report) Date : 29/11/2016 These petitions were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath,Adv. Mr. K.V.Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. MS. Aprul Shukla, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok H.Desai, Sr. Adv. (Mentioned by) Mr. S.S.Ray, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Lulia, Adv. MS. Rakhi Ray, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post after x-mas holidays. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master

$ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014in WP No. 1927/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 23450/2015(with Interim Relief) T.P.(C) No. 414/2016(with Office Report) Date : 29/11/2016 These petitions were mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath,Adv. Mr. K.V.Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. MS. Aprul Shukla, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok H.Desai, Sr. Adv. (Mentioned by) Mr. S.S.Ray, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Lulia, Adv. MS. Rakhi Ray, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post after x-mas holidays.(Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 10855 AND 23450 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF P.C. Joshi, Etc. ...Petitioners ­Versus­ Union of India  & Ors.                        .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT  The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30 th  June, 2016, along with connected T.P. (C) No. 414 of 2016, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Mr. Maninder Singh, learned ASG submits that counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1 has already been filed which he has instructions to adopt on behalf of respondents No. 2 to 5 also.  Respondents No. 6 to 7 appear to be proforma respondents.  Notice to the said respondents are, therefore, dispensed with.  Learned counsel for the petitioner, if so advised, file their rejoinder affidavits within four weeks. Post these petitions on 30.08.2016 along with Transfer Petitiion No...... (Number to be given by the learned counsel) I.A. No. 4 in SLP (C) No. 23450 of 2015 I.A. No. 4 is allowed.  The applicant is permitted to intervene in the matter. ” S.L.P. (C) NO. 10855 OF 2015 It is submitted that counsel for the respondent Nos. 1­5/Union of India has not filed counter affidavit so far.  No one has filed Vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 6­8 though served with the notice. It is further submitted that Ms. T. Anamika, Advocate for the petitioner has been designated as Additional District and Session Judge. Notice for alternative arrangement has been issued to the petitioner on 27 th  August, 2016 for his fresh representation before this Hon'ble Court.  Service is awaited.  S.L.P. (C) NO. 23450 OF 2015 It is submitted that counsel for respondent Nos. 1­4/Union of India has already filed Counter Affidavit on 2 nd  March, 2016 and copy of the counter affidavit has been included in the paper books. No rejoinder affidavit has been filed so far.  No one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos. 5­7, though served with notice.

­2­ It is lastly submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not furnished the Transfer Petition Number as directed by the Hon'ble Court on 30 th  June, 2016 despite this Registry's request. The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the   29 th  day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  1. Ms. T. Anamika, Advocate,     Chamber No. 63, GL.Sanghi Block.    2.  Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate,     Central Agency Section.      3. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate 48, Lawyer's Chamber. 4. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Advocate Chamber No. 133, Delhi High Court. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c1

1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dat ed 15/12/2014 in WP No. 1927/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 23450/2015 (With appln.(s) for intervention and Interim Relief) T.P.(C) No. 414/2016 (With Office Report) Date : 30/06/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K.Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, Adv. Mr Rishabh Parikh, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Dr. M.V.K.Moorthy, Adv. Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, Adv. Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam,Adv. Mr. Talha A.Rehman, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Satyajit A.Desai, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG, Mr. T.M.Singh, Adv.

2 Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Ashok Desai, Sr. Adv. Mr. V.Shekhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.S.Ray, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Gulia, Adv. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Maninder Singh, learned ASG submits that counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1 has already been filed which he has instructions to adopt on behalf of respondents No. 2 to 5 also. Respondents No. 6 to 7 appear to be proforma respondents. Notice to the said respondents are, therefore, dispensed with. Learned counsel for the petitioner, if so advised, file their rejoinder affidavits within four weeks. Post these petitions on 30.08.2016 along with Transfer Petition No...... (Number to be given by the learned counsel) I.A. No. 4 in SLP(C) No. 23450 of 2015 : Heard. I.A. No. 4 is allowed. The applicant is permitted to intervene in the matter. . (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 10855 AND 23450 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NO. 4 (Application for intervention in S.L.P. (C) No. 23450 of 2015) P.C. Joshi, Etc. ...Petitioners ­Versus­ Union of India  & Ors.                        .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT S.L.P. (C) NO. 10855 OF 2015  The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13 th   April, 2015 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order: “N otice.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the eight respondents on 25 th April, 2015 through registered A.D. Post.  Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has on 23 rd  July, 2015 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. A.D. Cards duly signed have been received back from Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on their behalf so far. It is submitted that office report with regard to not filing of counter affidavit was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court from time to time and lastly on 20 th  January, 2016, when the following order was passed:­ “The respondent Nos. 1­5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.  Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 6­8, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.  Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.” It is lastly submitted that counsel for the respondent Nos. 1­5/Union of India has not filed counter affidavit so far.  No one has filed Vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 6­8 though served with the notice. S.L.P. (C) NO. 23450 OF 2015 The matter above­mentioned  was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10 th  August, 2015 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:­

­2­        “ Delay condoned. Notice. Tag with S.L.P.(C) No. 10855 of 2015 Until further orders, there shall be interim stay of the operation and implementation of the impugned final order and judgment passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in W.P. (L) No. 1764 of 2011, dated 15.12.2014 .” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the seven Respondents on 8 th September, 2015 through registered A.D. Post. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has on 20 th November, 2015, filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1­4 and also on 2 nd  March, 2016, filed Counter Affidavit on their behalf.  Copy of the counter affidavit has been included in the paper books.  A.D. Card duly signed and stamped has been received back from respondent Nos. 5 ­7 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondent Nos. 5­7 so far. It is submitted that Ms. Rakhi Ray, Advocate has on 23 rd  September, 2015 filed application for intervention with affidavit praying therein that the Applicant viz. Supreme Court Bar Association may be permitted to intervene in the said SLP and the said application was listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber on 1 st  December, 2015, and again on 9 th  December, 2015, when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following order:­ “The application be listed alongwith the main matter before the regular Bench as and when the main matter is to be listed.” The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the  27 th  day of June, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  1. Ms. T. Anamika, Advocate,     Chamber No. 63, GL.Sanghi Block     2.  Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate,     Central Agency Section.      3. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate 48, Lawyer's Chamber. 4. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Advocate Chamber No. 133, Delhi High Court. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c1

è1ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dat ed15/12/2014 in WP No. 1927/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 23450/2015(With appln.(s) for intervention and Interim Relief) T.P.(C) No. 414/2016(With Office Report) Date : 30/06/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDFor Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K.Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, Adv. Mr Rishabh Parikh, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Dr. M.V.K.Moorthy, Adv.Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, Adv. Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam,Adv. Mr. Talha A.Rehman, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Satyajit A.Desai, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG, Mr. T.M.Singh, Adv.2 Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Ashok Desai, Sr. Adv. Mr. V.Shekhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.S.Ray, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Gulia, Adv. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Maninder Singh, learned ASG submits that counteraffidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1 has already been filedwhich he has instructions to adopt on behalf of respondents No. 2to 5 also. Respondents No. 6 to 7 appear to be proformarespondents. Notice to the said respondents are, therefore,dispensed with. Learned counsel for the petitioner, if so advised,file their rejoinder affidavits within four weeks. Post these petitions on 30.08.2016 along with TransferPetition No...... (Number to be given by the learned counsel)I.A. No. 4 in SLP(C) No. 23450 of 2015 :Heard.I.A. No. 4 is allowed. The applicant is permitted tointervene in the matter..(Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master

ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 20/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravindra Lokhande,Adv. Mr.B.Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.1-5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.6-8, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 20/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravindra Lokhande,Adv. Mr.B.Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.1-5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.6-8, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2016.01.20 (M V RAMESH)16:46:18 TLTReason: Registrar SB

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.8 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 4/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 23450/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014 in WPL No. 1764/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) BOMBAY BAR ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For intervention) Date : 09/12/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. S. S. Ray, Adv. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Gulia, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aruna Gupta, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The application be listed alongwith the main matter before the regular Bench as and when the main matter is to be listed. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Chander Bala) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.8 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 4/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 23450/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014 in WPL No. 1764/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) BOMBAY BAR ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For intervention) Date : 09/12/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. S. S. Ray, Adv. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Gulia, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aruna Gupta, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The application be listed alongwith the main matter before the regular Bench as and when the main matter is to be listed. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Chander Bala) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byASHWANI KUMARDate: 2015.12.1115:32:18 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 4/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23450/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014 in WPL No. 1764/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) BOMBAY BAR ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for intervention) Date : 01/12/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. (Not Present) UPON perusing papers, the Court made the following O R D E R No one appears for the parties. List next week. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Sr. P.A. (S. S. R. Krishna) Assistant Registrar

\210 ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 4/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23450/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014 in WPL No. 1764/2011 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) BOMBAY BAR ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for intervention) Date : 01/12/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. (Not Present) UPON perusing papers, the Court made the following O R D E R No one appears for the parties. List next week. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (S. S. R. Krishna) Sr. P.A. Assistant RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJayant Kumar AroraDate: 2015.12.0216:12:32 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 03/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent Nos.1-5 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.6-8, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. List the matter again on 20.01.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

SECTION ­ III          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10855 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF P.C. Joshi ...Petitioner ­Versus­ Union of India  & Ors.                   .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT  The Office Report was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 17 th  August, 2015 when the following order was passed: ­ “The respondent Nos. 1­ shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks.  Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 6­8, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. List the matter again on 03.11.2015 .” It is submitted that Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate who has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 has not filed Counter Affidavit on their behalf so far. It is further submitted that no  one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 so far through  A.D. Cards duly signed have been received back from Respondent Nos. 6 to 8. The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's  Court for orders. Dated this the  30 th  Day of October, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  1. Ms. T. Anamika, Advocate,    Chamber No. 63, GL.Sanghi Block      Supreme Court of India,      New Delhi. 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate,     Central Agency Section.      Supreme Court of India      New Delhi. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

´ ITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 03/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent Nos.1-5 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.6-8, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. List the matter again on 20.01.2016.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by (M V RAMESH)Sushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.11.0315:34:45 TLT Registrar SBReason:

ITEM NO.105 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 17/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.1-5 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.6-8, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. List the matter again on 03.11.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10855 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF P.C. Joshi ...Petitioner ­Versus­ Union of India  & Ors.                   .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT     The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13 th   April, 2015 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Issue notice.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the eight respondents on 25 th April, 2015 through registered A.D. Post.  Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has on 23 rd  July, 2015 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 but he has not filed Counter Affidavit on their behalf so far. It is submitted that A.D. Cards duly signed have been received back from Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on their behalf so far. The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's  Court for orders. Dated this the  12 th  Day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  1. Ms. T. Anamika, Advocate,    Chamber No. 63, GL.Sanghi Block      Supreme Court of India,      New Delhi. 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate,     Central Agency Section.      Supreme Court of India      New Delhi. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

¬ ITEM NO.105 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 17/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.1-5 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.6-8, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. List the matter again on 03.11.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.08.1910:56:58 TLTReason:

1 ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....CC No(s).13944/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014 in WPL No. 1764/2011 passed by the High Court of Bombay) BOMBAY BAR ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) Date : 10/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Parekh, Adv. Mr. Rohit Bhat, Adv. For Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Intervener(s) Mr. Ashok Desai, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. Ms. Anu Bindra, Adv. Mr. S.S. Ray, Adv. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Notice.

2 Tag with S.L.P.(C) No.10855 of 2015. Until further orders, there shall be interim stay of the operation and implementation of the impugned final order and judgment passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in W.P.(L) No.1764 of 2011, dated 15.12.2014 (Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Vinod Kulvi) Assistant Registrar

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) CC NO. 13944 OF 2015 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1-2 (Applications for condonation of delay in filing and refiling file SLP) Bombay Bar Association …..Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. ….Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned has been filed by Mr. E.. Agrawala, Advocate, on behalf of the Petitioner against the Final Judgment and Order dated 15 th December, 2014 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in W.P. (L) No. 1764 of 2011. There is a delay of 57 days in filing and 49 days in refiling the SLP. It is submitted that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 10855 of 2015 arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13 th April, 2015 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to direct issue notice and the same is pending for hearing. Copy of the Record of Proceedings dated 13 th April, 2015 is marked at Annexure 'P-9' at page No. 136 of the Paper Books. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 28861 of 2011 @ SLP (C) CC No. 15646 of 2011 referred to on Annexure 'P-8' was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11th October, 2011 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to dismiss the same. Copy of the Record of Proceedigs dated 11 th October, 2011 is marked at Annexure 'P-8' at page Nos. 135 of the Paper Books. The matter is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this Office Report Dated this the 4 th d Day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate 48, Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

\200 1 ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....CC No(s).13944/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014 in WPL No. 1764/2011 passed by the High Court of Bombay) BOMBAY BAR ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) Date : 10/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Parekh, Adv. Mr. Rohit Bhat, Adv. For Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Intervener(s) Mr. Ashok Desai, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. Ms. Anu Bindra, Adv. Mr. S.S. Ray, Adv. Ms. Rakhi Ray, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingSignature Not Verified O R D E RDigitally signed byNEETU KHAJURIADate: 2015.08.1116:28:04 ISTReason: Delay condoned. Notice. 2 Tag with S.L.P.(C) No.10855 of 2015. Until further orders, there shall be interimstay of the operation and implementation of theimpugned final order and judgment passed by theHigh Court of Judicature at Bombay in W.P.(L)No.1764 of 2011, dated 15.12.2014

(Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) Sr.P.A. Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10855/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2014 in WP No. 1927/2011 passed by the High Court of Bombay) P.C. JOSHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date : 13/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Dr. M.V.K. Moorthy, Adv. Mr. B.V. Chandan, Adv. For Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice. (Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Vinod Kulvi) Assistant Registrar