C.A. No. 000721 / 2026

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 View Full Judgment

A High Court cannot distinguish the case of a co-petitioner standing on identical footing by relying on a subsequent fact that was neither part of the original proceedings nor duly enquired into. Where co-petitioners face substantively similar disqualification orders arising from the same enquiry proceedings, principles of natural justice and procedural fairness demand uniform treatment. This analysis, available on casestatus.in, further affirms that an authority may consider subsequent facts only through a fresh, proper inquiry rather than as a basis for selective judicial differentiation.